Probate & Estate Disputes

What Is a Part IV Claim in Victoria?

Family provision claims under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) — eligibility, adequate provision, evidence, time limits and possible outcomes.

Published by Holt & Macdonald LawyersReviewed by Jim Parke14 May 2026Updated 7 August 2026Jurisdiction Victoria, Australia

A Part IV claim — sometimes called a family provision claim or testator’s family maintenance (TFM) claim — is a claim under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) that a deceased person’s will (or the intestacy rules) did not make adequate provision for the proper maintenance and support of an eligible person.

Part IV claims are one of the most contested and misunderstood areas of estate law in Victoria. This guide explains the essentials. For advice on a specific matter, see our Contested Wills & Part IV Claims and Probate & Deceased Estates pages.

What a Part IV claim is

A Part IV claim asks the Supreme Court of Victoria (or in some cases the County Court) to order that further provision be made from a deceased person’s estate to an eligible person, on the basis that the deceased had a moral duty to provide for that person and did not adequately do so.

The order does not rewrite the will as a matter of preference. The threshold questions are whether the person is eligible and whether adequate provision was made.

Who may be eligible

Only an “eligible person” within the meaning of section 90 of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) may apply. The statutory definition is detailed, and the conditions are not the same for every category — several categories require, in addition to the relationship itself, matters such as dependency on the deceased for maintenance and support, being under 18, being a full-time student under 25, or having a disability. Whether a particular person qualifies depends on their category and the facts.

Representative examples, each subject to the conditions in the Act, include:

  • a spouse or domestic partner of the deceased at the time of death;
  • a child (including an adopted child) or a stepchild — where the person is an adult who is not under a disability, additional conditions apply;
  • a former spouse or former domestic partner, but only in the defined circumstances where family law proceedings could have been taken and were not concluded;
  • a registered caring partner, or a member of the deceased’s household, where the further statutory conditions (including dependency in the defined sense) are satisfied;
  • a grandchild, and an assumed child, subject to the dependency and other conditions in the Act.

This is a summary only, not the statutory text. Eligibility is also only a threshold: being eligible does not mean a claim will succeed — the applicant must still show that adequate provision was not made.

Adequate provision

The court asks two related questions:

  1. Did the deceased have a moral duty to provide for the applicant?
  2. If so, does the provision made under the will (or intestacy) fall short of what the deceased ought to have provided for the applicant’s proper maintenance and support?

“Proper maintenance and support” is not confined to bare subsistence — it is assessed by reference to community standards, the size of the estate, the applicant’s circumstances and the competing claims of other beneficiaries.

Factors the court considers

Section 91A of the Act lists the matters the court must consider, including:

  • the nature of the relationship between the applicant and the deceased;
  • any obligations or responsibilities of the deceased to the applicant and beneficiaries;
  • the size and nature of the estate;
  • the financial resources (including earning capacity) and financial needs of the applicant and beneficiaries;
  • the applicant’s age, physical and mental health;
  • any contribution by the applicant to the deceased’s estate or welfare;
  • benefits previously given by the deceased to the applicant or beneficiaries;
  • the character and conduct of the applicant;
  • any liability of the deceased to support any other person.

Evidence commonly required

Applicants (and executors defending a claim) typically need:

  • an affidavit setting out the relationship with the deceased;
  • full details of the applicant’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses;
  • medical evidence where health is relied on;
  • evidence of any contribution made to the deceased’s welfare or estate;
  • details of gifts or advances made during the deceased’s lifetime.

Time limits

A Part IV claim must generally be commenced within six months of the date of the grant of probate or letters of administration (section 99). The court has a limited discretion to extend time, but that is not guaranteed and should not be relied upon. Executors are usually reluctant to distribute the estate until this period has passed.

Mediation and settlement

Most Part IV proceedings are referred to mediation. A very high proportion resolve at or before mediation. Reasons include the emotional and financial cost of a contested hearing, the risk that costs may be borne personally by the losing party in some circumstances, and the desire to preserve family relationships.

Possible outcomes

A successful claim can result in:

  • a lump sum from the estate;
  • a life interest in property;
  • a right of residence;
  • a specific asset or portfolio;
  • a combination of the above.

The court will only make an order to the extent needed for the applicant’s proper maintenance and support. Costs are within the court’s discretion — the old assumption that costs would always come out of the estate no longer applies.

Defending a claim

Executors have a duty to defend the estate on behalf of the beneficiaries. That does not mean fighting every claim to the end. It means giving considered advice on prospects, settlement, and cost risk, and taking a commercial view of resolution.

Executor considerations

Executors should generally:

  • not distribute the estate before the six-month claim period has passed, unless appropriate indemnities and advice are in place;
  • respond promptly to any claim or foreshadowed claim;
  • keep beneficiaries reasonably informed;
  • obtain legal advice before agreeing to any compromise.

Why prompt advice matters

Time limits are strict, and the cost of a Part IV dispute can be significant. Whether you may be an eligible person considering a claim, or an executor served with one, prompt advice is essential.

Holt & Macdonald acts for both claimants and executors in Part IV matters across Melbourne’s eastern suburbs and the wider Victorian jurisdiction. See our Contested Wills & Part IV Claims page for how we can assist.

Official sources

This article relies on the following primary legislation and official court or government material. Each link opens the current official page.

Local Practice

Holt & Macdonald has long provided quality legal services throughout Ringwood and Melbourne's eastern suburbs — including Mitcham, Heathmont, Croydon, Blackburn, Vermont and Wantirna.

Accreditation & Standards

Holt & Macdonald is an accredited specialist and ISO-certified legal practice.

Law Institute of Victoria Accredited Specialist — Holt & Macdonald Lawyers Ringwood
ISO 9001 quality management certification — Ringwood legal practice
ISO 14001 environmental management certification — Ringwood legal practice
ISO 45001 occupational health and safety certification — Ringwood legal practice